RJ Ledesma

This is where you go if you want more RJ!

RJ Ledesma header image 4

My Yaya and I are inviting you!

October 13th, 2009 by RJ Ledesma
Respond

Dear blogging community! You are all invited to the launch of my newest humor compilation, “I Do or I Die! RJ Ledesma’s Imaginary Guide to Getting Married and Other Man-made Disasters (As told to him by his Yaya)” on October 22 (Thursday) 6pm@National Bookstore, Glorietta 5, Makati City. Please feel free to bring your friends, buy several signed copies of the book, and help me pay for my baby’s diapers! Thanks for the support.

idooridie

Tags:   · 1 Comment

Guess who is on the cover of UNO Magazine’s October cover?

October 9th, 2009 by RJ Ledesma
Respond

Guess who is on the cover of UNO Magazine?  Floats like a butterfly, stings like a bee….-1

Tags:   · 1 Comment

Who is on the October cover of UNO Magazine? A teaser

September 29th, 2009 by RJ Ledesma
Respond

And here’s a hint: It’s not Freddy Kreuger.

Unknown

Tags:   · 1 Comment

My new book is out!

September 29th, 2009 by RJ Ledesma
Respond

i do or i die

Dear all,

Please check out my new book from Anvil Publishing, “I Do or I Die! RJ Ledesma’s Imaginary Guide to Getting Married and Other Man-Made Disasters (As Told to him by his Yaya” now available at National Bookstores and Powerbooks nationwide! Please buy a copy and help me pay for my baby’s diapers!

I am reprinting the foreword to my book written by my former Creative Writing professor and mentor Dr. Isagani Cruz.  Thanks again Dr. Cruz for the great foreword!

The forgettable 1921 novel Scaramouche opens with these unforgettable lines: “He was born with a gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.” All Filipinos were born with a gift of laughter, but very few realize that the world is mad.

For the world – at least the world that Filipinos live in – is mad, not in the American sense that It is a Mad Mad Mad Mad World nor in the African sense that The Gods Must Be Crazy nor in the Latin American magic / magical / marvelous realist sense, but in a distinctively Filipino, laugh-while-your-house-is-burning sense, the only sense that has made Filipinos treat a coup d’état as a revolution and a fiesta at the same time, enjoying junk food while kicking out an acknowledged dictator or a perceived degenerate, later forgiving and forgetting all personal and political hurts, grinning while posing for photos with record-breaking thieves and erstwhile objects of collective hatred, lying down and enjoying being literally or figuratively raped and boasting about it.

You cannot get any weirder than in the Philippines, and RJ Ledesma (http://rjledesma.net/) knows it. Using the oldest trick in the literary book, which is to create a character who is a character, he has raised his nanny (called a yaya in the Philippines, with a complete subculture built on the name, including a language codified by professional linguists as “Yaya English”) to the level of an icon.

All this sounds much too serious in an introduction to a book that calls out not to be taken seriously, but comedy is much too funny to be left to people with a sense of humor.

Aristotle, the great brain that he was and even with his too-valued two-valued logic, could not make heads or non-heads out of comedy. He wrote some random notes, realized that his reputation two centuries hence would be ruined if the notes would be discovered, and promptly ate the notes. Yes, ate them. (Since everything he wrote was preserved by his followers, it is safe to say that, to prevent his fans from overzeal, he himself ensured the non-survival of his notes on comedy by eating them. It was the only way to frustrate those wishing to sink their teeth into everything he wrote. It was also a way not to have to eat his words in the future against his will. To prove me wrong, you would have to build a time machine and, even then, you would have to catch Aristotle at the very moment he was composing the missing treatise on comedy. I could have painted a more probable scenario, but it would be toilet humor, quite unbecoming a professor.)

A number of otherwise sober people have since pontificated about comedy, among them Henri Bergson, who famously quipped that man is the animal that laughs, conveniently ignoring the loud laughter of women at such a sexist, exclusivist, anti-feminist, politically incorrect outburst. Real-life life-and-death medical doctors, led by Robin Williams’ fictional Patch Adams (not the real Patch Adams, born Hunter Campbell Adams, who set up a very serious clinic in West Virginia that is leading a very serious war against very serious medical insurance but, yes, is better known for traveling around the world with his doctor-friends dressed up as clowns healing children just by looking silly), have also been continually coming up with evidence that laughter, as Reader’s Digest discovered zillions of issues ago, is the best medicine.

There is no end to writers that attempt to write comedy. Many comics are funny, but few are hilarious. Ledesma is, well, hilarious.

What makes him even more hilarious than most writers of comedy (and there are not, sadly enough, too many of them in the Philippines, at least not as many as the grim-and-determined, anti-feudalist, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, anti-Manila, anti-English, anti-Malacañang constipated types) is that he finds even things familiar to us funny.

Ledesma was my student in creative writing at De La Salle University. In the beginning, he fancied himself an economist, taking up an undergraduate degree in economics. I like to flatter myself by saying that I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by making him go the route of underpaid, unpaid, unappreciated, unwanted creative writers instead of the yellow brick road leading to, perhaps, a reign as the country’s economic czar or even a small-but-terrible economics-major president (as you read the book, you will see how many times the most unliked president in the history of the nation gets ridiculed). Of course, Ledesma is not really small, unless you believe everything he says about himself.

In my creative writing classes, despite my having been educated as a poststructuralist, postcolonial, postfeminist, postmarxist, post-post-something or other, I revert back to formalism and recite as my mantra the underrated dictum of the Russian Formalists, namely, that creative writers should make the familiar unfamiliar (there’s even a long, coined word for it, but it smacks of pretentiousness, so I only whisper it to my students when I catch them texting or doodling or otherwise not paying close attention to every profound syllable I utter). “Defamiliarization” is a word guaranteed to make even the dumbest basketball player in class sit up and pretend to listen, if only because it sounds obscene.

Ledesma makes everything seem unfamiliar, from the conventional rituals of getting married to going on a foreign trip to realizing that one is balding. That is the secret of his humor: he makes his fellowmen (yes, men as in male gender, not men as in all men are created equal or are mortal) laugh at themselves. Not being a woman nor even inclined to become one, despite that being the fashion among macho men these days, I cannot even guess at how a woman will react to the continuous ribbing aimed at what we unreconstructed males used to regard as the gentle sex before a decidedly ungentle widow accused an even more decidedly ungentle woman of stealing the presidency not once, but twice. Hell hath no fury and all that, but why, in heaven’s name, can men no longer talk about women in disdainful terms without being hauled to court for sexual harassment, political discrimination, misogyny, or whatever? I am sure women, when they are alone, have all kinds of nasty things to say about men, but men, being the denser sex, do not have an inkling of what is really going on. But I am only guessing.

Ledesma is also always only guessing. His ribbing is never not in jest, but where there is comic smoke, there is bound to be tragic truth. Or so the philosophers say, or should say, or should have said. In any case, it will not pay to take Ledesma too seriously, though it makes perfect sense to pay for this book you are reading, in case you just borrowed it, or are just browsing through it in a bookstore, or stole it at gunpoint from someone not willing to give up a cellphone but willing to give up what gives much more pleasure than the latest ringtone or the received message “I love you too,” which happens to be a template on many cellphones (and like most templates, totally meaningless).

Not at all meaningless is the love that these pages clearly reflect, a love not three removes from reality (as that other Greek philosopher without a sense of humor liked to characterize anything he disliked) but very, very real, even more real than a reality television show. Ledesma’s love for his significant other oozes out of the laughter, exactly like the Tagalized Spanish “karinyo brutal,” a bit like imported, expensive chocolate that melts in your mouth and surprises you with some kind of nut inside. Not that Ledesma is a nut, though I suppose he himself would not hesitate to call himself that. As my student, he cannot not be a non-nut, since I always pride myself on being better than my students at anything, even in being a nut.

At the end of the day, I am very proud of RJ Ledesma, one of the best students I have ever had in my creative writing classes. I do not mean that in terms of grades; I do not even remember if he got a good grade, though he must have or he would not have invited me to write this foreword. What I mean is that he has parlayed the little he learned from my class into something I myself would never be able to accomplish – a set of lovely essays bordering on creative nonfiction, classic comedy, and – to use the L word – literature. Needless to say, I am sick with envy. I mean, I would do anything to have written this book, which is about how to live happily before, during, and even after a fairy-tale wedding.

Now that I am old and bald and living in surrealist Philippines, I still laugh out loud, and I laugh loudest when I encounter the comic spurts of genius that Ledesma exhibits in this book, as well as in his earlier book, in his columns, and in his blog.

What more can an aging professor want? Now, let me show you the first two hundred items in my bucket list, beginning with writing a book like this one you are holding in your hands …

Isagani R. Cruz
Professor Emeritus
De La Salle University

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · 2 Comments

Return of the Heroine

September 9th, 2009 by RJ Ledesma
Respond

After last week’s article on former beauty queen, model, actress and adolescent fantasy of every Pinoy male who discovered the thrill of testosterone in the eighties Ms. Tetchie Agbayani, featured a headshot from her 1982 German Playboy pictorial dressed in a white jungle-inspired headband, teardrop earrings and not much else, I received a gush of emails, texts and notes scribbled in permanent bodily fluids from DOMs of all ages, wig sizes and jail terms. These felons, este, men were clamoring for more of Ms. Tetchie’s less. In fact, many of them had spent the week scouring through their mothball-filled closets, hermetically sealed vaults, and underground dungeons to find that old dog-eared issue of Ms. Tetchie so that they could relive the excesses of their youth.

But since many of their Playboy issues have been lost the ravages of time, pilferage and repossession by the courts, allow me to help them re-live their memories of Ms. Tetchie without fear of parental (or spouse) approval (whatever the case may be), court intervention or chemical castration in the second part of our interview. In this concluding portion of Ms. Tetchie’s interview, she details her encounter with anti-pornography crusader Polly Cayetano, where you find your inner sexy, and how to react when you see naked pictures of yourself in a men’s magazine.

TO NUDE OR NOT TO NUDE

Ma’am Tetchie, how did you physically prepare for the shoot? Did you have to do sit ups? Did you have to depilate in strategic areas? Did you practice holding your breath?
(Laughs) Siyempre (Of course)! Holding your breath, that’s part of it. But I have an aversion to repetitious exercise.
And to think that repetitive exercise is a favorite exercise among many male adolescents. How did you emotionally prepare for the pictorial? I’m sure it was an abrupt transition from posing in a dress to posing in a state of undress.
I must admit, I didn’t prepare much emotionally and psychologically. After the end of the first day’s shoot, my muscles were in pain and that’s when it hit me ‘Hang on, what am I doing!?’ What if this photographer isn’t really from Playboy? What if he uses my pictures for a more dubious enterprise? I wanted to back out. So I talked to Papang (her manager) about my concern and he spoke to the photographers. Later, Herbert (the photographer) came up to me and said, ‘I heard you have some apprehensions. Listen, here is our passport, if we don’t fulfill our part of the bargain, we won’t be leave our country.’ That was a sign of good faith for me. So, of course, I took their passports.
The Bureau of Immigration would be proud. Weren’t you the least bit conscious at all when you posed nude? Not even embarrassed? I’ve embarrassed to even look at myself nude (Liar – RJ’s wife).
(Laughs) Why!? Why would you be conscious naman?
I don’t really want people staring at my mutant power.
Like any other job, you perform your work because its part of your job description. At that time, I was a model. Will I refuse work just because I have to pose in the nude? Parang hindi ko kaya (Like I could not do it)!?
Hay naku, Kayang-kayang niyo po yan (Of course you can do it, ma’am)!
Parang bawas ganda points sa akin na ang trabaho kong ito ay hindi magampanan bilang modelo (It would lessen lessen my beauty points if I couldn’t fulfill my role as a mdoel). Just because I’m nude? It is a blow in my capacity to perform as a model if I turned it down.
You are right, we should not blow our capacities. Future generations of models should take your advice as gospel.
Did I have any inhibitions? I’m very comfortable in my skin. I have no problems (Laughs).
We are comfortable with your skin as well.
Don’t get me wrong though, I’m not an exhibitionist ok?
I wouldn’t have even known, ma’am Tetchie.

HARE-RAISING EXPERIENCE

Ma’am Tetchie, you helped many a PX store in the eighties meet their profit margins when they imported copies of your German Playboy cover. Did you ever think that your issue would find its way to Philippine shores?
Not at all! I thought that when I did this job, it would come and go and no one would even notice it. I was just as shocked as everyone else when it came out because I wasn’t anticipating that all these pilots and stewardesses would be bringing that issue in the country and then kumalat (scattered). I didn’t expect it at all! When the Playboy issue was shown to me, my jaw dropped.
A lot of things dropped with your Playboy appearance, ma’am Tetchie.
And I said, ‘Ang ganda (How beautiful)!’ (Laughs boisterously). I was totally taken aback. I didn’t imagine it would come out like that because it wasn’t my style to ask the photographer if I could see how every shot came out. I do my work and I move on. I’m not so obsessed with myself. To me, it’s a job..
That’s right, not when there are many others who will obsess over your work for you. Ma’am Tetchie, is that issue of Playboy framed in your home? I know some men who have devotional altars to that issue bronzed in their rooms.
My personal copy was borrowed and I never get it back so I don’t really own a copy of it.
I know many men who would like to offer you their personal copy, but I’d advise you against accepting it. You don’t know where that issue has been. I read that there appearing in your birthday suit led to a lawsuit that was at that time led by a Polly Cayetano? How did that make you feel and what did you do about it? That must have been bewildering for a twenty-one year old.
Exactly! I thought, ‘God I’m only twenty one and I already have a lawsuit!’ I was baffled by everybody’s reactions. There was a big uproar and I didn’t understand why a personal decision I made is now a social commentary for the whole country! All of a sudden, there were issues of morality and ‘was it right?’ and the Maria Clara image. So many people said many things, but I didn’t really milk it for all that it was worth. You wouldn’t see me in any of the talk shows even if I had standing invitations to guest in all of them. I was just quiet.
And there are some artistas nowadays who milk the issue until the cow keels over from dehydration. I understand you actually met Polly Cayetano a couple of years ago? How was that like? Was there mature language and situations involved? Were there brief but intense moments of violence? Or was it a PG-13 moment?
It was a very pleasant and cordial meeting. I had a show at that time with Channel 4, (Pandayan ni Mang Pandoy) and she was my guest on the show. I knew she was Polly Cayetano, but we never met before that. Basically, I felt that I genuinely liked her and I believe she liked me as well. In fact we laughed about the Playboy incident.
You mean “Hahaha, it was funny that you once traumatized a twenty-one year old model with a million peso lawsuit” type of laugh? You are an extremely good-natured person, ma’am Tetchie.
I had no animosity for the lady. Yes she made all this trouble for me, but nothing happened to lawsuit. It was dropped after a year. I was ok. Polly said. ‘Mabait ka pala (You’re a good person), I really like you.’
She might have been originally been working under the assumption that ‘if you take pose naked, then you are evil’. But I say let Filipino men be the judge of what evil truly is.

SEXY IS AS SEXY DOES

Ma’am Tetchie, just how do you project that ‘sexy’ look with your face. I have tried to emulate that ‘sexy’ look at home, but my wife tells me it makes me look constipated.
If you want to do some sexy poses, it has to start with the eyes then everything else follows. The whole secret to posing for a picture is for something to be happening in your head. You have to be thinking of something, and it has be congruent to what you want to project. The sexiest photographs are those that capture you thinking of something interesting and looking out into the open. Those nonchalant, pensive shots that aren’t staged. Those are sexier for me. If you are going to pose sexy, or in the nude, and you are thinking about men and sex, it’s not going to come out sexy. It’s going to come out vulgar.
Ill try not to think about men and sex the next time I pose sexy.
You know what? I never projected the ‘Hey, I’m sexy!’ look. I never try to be sexy. Nababaduyan ako diyan (I find that really cheesy). I’m just being who I am. In fact, I align myself with nature. I imagine that the wind is blowing in my face and I end up closing my eyes and then they take my photo. Natural na natural lang (Very natural). In fact, I’m still not used to it when people call me sexy.
Neither am I.
Even if I have bilbil (love handles), even if I am not in the most perfect shape like I was several years ago, I don’t really care. I still feel happy about myself. Sexy is a state of being.
That’s what I tell my wife she catches me staring at myself in the mirror.

DRUM ROLL PLEASE…

So Ma’am Tetchie, the million peso question: Would you ever pose au naturel again?
Depends (laughs)
On behalf of the millions of men from around the country reading this column right now who are crossing themselves, falling to their knees and with tears streaming from their eyes, we would like to thank you.

(RJ scribbles in this notebook: Ok, set pictorial for Tetchie Agbayani. Next stop: Marissa Delgado)

(For those who didn’t get the Marissa Delgado reference: She was arguably the first Filipina to appear in Playboy (USA Edition): “The Girls of the Orient” photoshoot in December 1968.)

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.